Source:
Original headline: Se connecter ou créer un compte
Source summary:
Source URL:
Return JSON with keys: title (max 90 chars, no clickbait), excerpt (1 sentence), body (plain text, 3 to 6 short paragraphs separated by \n\n, 250-500 words), meta_title, meta_description. Do not mention that this is rewritten. Do not include markdown, HTML or the source URL inside the body."
We have no content. The source summary is blank, and the original headline is "Se connecter ou créer un compte" which is French for "Log in or create an account". That's not a news article. There's no actual article content. The user is asking to rewrite a horse-racing news item but the source is blank. This is a problem: we have no source content to rewrite. According to policy, we must not hallucinate content. We cannot produce a news article without source content. We must ask for clarification or indicate inability.
We must respond with JSON? The user wants JSON output. But we cannot produce content because we have no source. According to policy: If the user asks for rewriting but no source content is provided, we should ask for clarification or request the content. We can ask the user to provide the article. So we should respond asking for the source article.
Thus we should respond with a JSON containing an error? Or ask for clarification. The user wants JSON output. We can produce a JSON with error field: "Please provide the source article." But the user expects a JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description. We can produce a JSON with a note that we need the source. However the instruction says "Return JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description." There's no mention of error handling. But we can respond with a JSON containing an error message.
Better to ask for clarification: "I need the source article to rewrite." That is not a JSON, but we can ask for clarification. The user explicitly wants JSON. The user says "Return JSON with keys: ...". But we cannot produce meaningful output without source. According to policy, we should ask for clarification. So we should respond asking the user to provide the article.
Thus we respond with a plain text request for the source.
We should not produce JSON. The user expects JSON but we cannot produce it. According to policy, we can ask for clarification. So we respond with a request for the source.
Thus final answer: "Please provide the source article you want rewritten."
Je ne peux pas rédiger l'article sans le contenu source. Pourriez‑vous me fournir le texte ou le résumé de la nouvelle que vous souhaitez voir réécrit ?
Original headline: Se connecter ou créer un compte
Source summary:
Source URL:
Return JSON with keys: title (max 90 chars, no clickbait), excerpt (1 sentence), body (plain text, 3 to 6 short paragraphs separated by \n\n, 250-500 words), meta_title, meta_description. Do not mention that this is rewritten. Do not include markdown, HTML or the source URL inside the body."
We have no content. The source summary is blank, and the original headline is "Se connecter ou créer un compte" which is French for "Log in or create an account". That's not a news article. There's no actual article content. The user is asking to rewrite a horse-racing news item but the source is blank. This is a problem: we have no source content to rewrite. According to policy, we must not hallucinate content. We cannot produce a news article without source content. We must ask for clarification or indicate inability.
We must respond with JSON? The user wants JSON output. But we cannot produce content because we have no source. According to policy: If the user asks for rewriting but no source content is provided, we should ask for clarification or request the content. We can ask the user to provide the article. So we should respond asking for the source article.
Thus we should respond with a JSON containing an error? Or ask for clarification. The user wants JSON output. We can produce a JSON with error field: "Please provide the source article." But the user expects a JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description. We can produce a JSON with a note that we need the source. However the instruction says "Return JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description." There's no mention of error handling. But we can respond with a JSON containing an error message.
Better to ask for clarification: "I need the source article to rewrite." That is not a JSON, but we can ask for clarification. The user explicitly wants JSON. The user says "Return JSON with keys: ...". But we cannot produce meaningful output without source. According to policy, we should ask for clarification. So we should respond asking the user to provide the article.
Thus we respond with a plain text request for the source.
We should not produce JSON. The user expects JSON but we cannot produce it. According to policy, we can ask for clarification. So we respond with a request for the source.
Thus final answer: "Please provide the source article you want rewritten."
Je ne peux pas rédiger l'article sans le contenu source. Pourriez‑vous me fournir le texte ou le résumé de la nouvelle que vous souhaitez voir réécrit ?
Publicité
Source: Alsace