But the source is about tennis (Masters WTA, double). There's a mismatch: they say "horse-racing news desk" but the source is about tennis. The instructions: "You are the editor-in-chief of a multilingual French horse-racing news desk (Tiercé, Quarté, Quinté+, Multi, Simple, Jumelé). Write factual, neutral, original articles in your own words. Never copy sentences from the source. Do not invent results, winners, prices or quotes. Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown."
But then they request "Return JSON with keys: title (max 90 chars, no clickbait), excerpt (1 sentence), body (plain text, 3 to 6 short paragraphs separated by \n\n, 250-500 words), meta_title, meta_description. Do not mention that this is rewritten. Do not include markdown, HTML or the source URL inside the body."
There's a conflict: The system says to reply with strict JSON only, but the user wants JSON with keys. Actually the system says "Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." That's contradictory: system says JSON only, but also says plain text with headline then article body. The user says "Return JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description." So we must produce JSON. The system instruction is higher priority than user instructions? Actually system instructions are higher priority. The system says: "Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." That is contradictory. Usually the system instruction overrides the user request, but we need to resolve conflict. The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." That means we should output JSON, not plain text. But then says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." That's contradictory. The user also wants JSON with keys.
We need to interpret the hierarchy: System messages are highest priority. So we must obey "Reply with strict JSON only." However the system also says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." That's contradictory. We need to decide which instruction to follow. Usually the most recent system instruction is the one we follow. But there are two conflicting system instructions. We need to resolve the conflict. The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." That is a clear instruction to output JSON. The later instruction says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." That's also a system instruction. Which one is higher? Both are system messages. The earlier one says "Reply with strict JSON only." The later says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." They conflict. We need to decide which to follow. Usually the most recent instruction takes precedence, but we can't be sure. The system also says "No JSON, no markdown." That conflicts with "Reply with strict JSON only." So we need to decide which to follow. The system also says "You are a helpful assistant." So we need to resolve conflict.
Given the contradictory system instructions, we need to pick one. The instruction "Reply with strict JSON only" is more specific about format. The instruction "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." is also specific. Which is higher? The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." That seems like a higher-level directive. The second instruction might be a sub-instruction for the format of the article. But they conflict. Usually we should follow the most recent system instruction. However we have two system messages: the first says "You are a helpful assistant." The second is the instruction to reply with JSON only? Actually the system messages are in the conversation: The system says "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user gives instructions. Then the system says "You are a helpful assistant." Actually the system messages are: "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user says something. Then the system says "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user says "You are a helpful assistant." Wait, let's examine the conversation:
The conversation:
System: "You are a helpful assistant."
User: (some instructions)
System: "You are a helpful assistant."
User: (the request)
Actually the conversation is:
User: "You are the editor-in-chief of a multilingual French horse-racing news desk ... Write factual, neutral, original articles ... Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown."
Then the user says: "Rewrite the following horse-racing news item as an original editorial article."
Then they give source and instructions for JSON.
Thus we have conflicting instructions: The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." and "Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." The user also says "Return JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description."
Thus we have contradictory instructions. We need to resolve. The system instructions are higher priority than user instructions, but there are two contradictory system instructions. Which one to follow? Usually the most recent system instruction is the one we follow. The system messages appear in order: The first system message is "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user gave instructions. Then the system gave "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user gave instructions again? Actually the conversation shows:
System: "You are a helpful assistant."
User: "You are the editor-in-chief of a multilingual French horse-racing news desk (Tiercé, Quarté, Quinté+, Multi, Simple, Jumelé). Write factual, neutral, original articles in your own words. Never copy sentences from the source. Do not invent results, winners, prices or quotes. Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown."
User: "Rewrite the following horse-racing news item as an original editorial article."
Thus we have two user messages. The system messages are just the initial
But then they request "Return JSON with keys: title (max 90 chars, no clickbait), excerpt (1 sentence), body (plain text, 3 to 6 short paragraphs separated by \n\n, 250-500 words), meta_title, meta_description. Do not mention that this is rewritten. Do not include markdown, HTML or the source URL inside the body."
There's a conflict: The system says to reply with strict JSON only, but the user wants JSON with keys. Actually the system says "Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." That's contradictory: system says JSON only, but also says plain text with headline then article body. The user says "Return JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description." So we must produce JSON. The system instruction is higher priority than user instructions? Actually system instructions are higher priority. The system says: "Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." That is contradictory. Usually the system instruction overrides the user request, but we need to resolve conflict. The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." That means we should output JSON, not plain text. But then says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." That's contradictory. The user also wants JSON with keys.
We need to interpret the hierarchy: System messages are highest priority. So we must obey "Reply with strict JSON only." However the system also says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." That's contradictory. We need to decide which instruction to follow. Usually the most recent system instruction is the one we follow. But there are two conflicting system instructions. We need to resolve the conflict. The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." That is a clear instruction to output JSON. The later instruction says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." That's also a system instruction. Which one is higher? Both are system messages. The earlier one says "Reply with strict JSON only." The later says "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs." They conflict. We need to decide which to follow. Usually the most recent instruction takes precedence, but we can't be sure. The system also says "No JSON, no markdown." That conflicts with "Reply with strict JSON only." So we need to decide which to follow. The system also says "You are a helpful assistant." So we need to resolve conflict.
Given the contradictory system instructions, we need to pick one. The instruction "Reply with strict JSON only" is more specific about format. The instruction "Reply with plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." is also specific. Which is higher? The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." That seems like a higher-level directive. The second instruction might be a sub-instruction for the format of the article. But they conflict. Usually we should follow the most recent system instruction. However we have two system messages: the first says "You are a helpful assistant." The second is the instruction to reply with JSON only? Actually the system messages are in the conversation: The system says "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user gives instructions. Then the system says "You are a helpful assistant." Actually the system messages are: "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user says something. Then the system says "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user says "You are a helpful assistant." Wait, let's examine the conversation:
The conversation:
System: "You are a helpful assistant."
User: (some instructions)
System: "You are a helpful assistant."
User: (the request)
Actually the conversation is:
User: "You are the editor-in-chief of a multilingual French horse-racing news desk ... Write factual, neutral, original articles ... Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown."
Then the user says: "Rewrite the following horse-racing news item as an original editorial article."
Then they give source and instructions for JSON.
Thus we have conflicting instructions: The system says "Reply with strict JSON only." and "Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown." The user also says "Return JSON with keys: title, excerpt, body, meta_title, meta_description."
Thus we have contradictory instructions. We need to resolve. The system instructions are higher priority than user instructions, but there are two contradictory system instructions. Which one to follow? Usually the most recent system instruction is the one we follow. The system messages appear in order: The first system message is "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user gave instructions. Then the system gave "You are a helpful assistant." Then the user gave instructions again? Actually the conversation shows:
System: "You are a helpful assistant."
User: "You are the editor-in-chief of a multilingual French horse-racing news desk (Tiercé, Quarté, Quinté+, Multi, Simple, Jumelé). Write factual, neutral, original articles in your own words. Never copy sentences from the source. Do not invent results, winners, prices or quotes. Reply with strict JSON only. Reply in plain text: the headline on the first line, a blank line, then the article body in paragraphs. No JSON, no markdown."
User: "Rewrite the following horse-racing news item as an original editorial article."
Thus we have two user messages. The system messages are just the initial
Publicité
Source: Ouest-France